March 26, 2026

4.9 Stars ≠ Good Care: The Problem with Healthcare Metrics (with Larry Benz)

4.9 Stars ≠ Good Care: The Problem with Healthcare Metrics (with Larry Benz)
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player iconAmazon Music podcast player iconAudible podcast player iconCastbox podcast player iconGaana podcast player iconiHeartRadio podcast player iconYouTube podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player iconAmazon Music podcast player iconAudible podcast player iconCastbox podcast player iconGaana podcast player iconiHeartRadio podcast player iconYouTube podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player icon

What if the problem in healthcare isn’t a lack of data… but the wrong data?


In this episode, Larry Benz joins the show to unpack a quiet shift that’s happening across healthcare:


We’ve started confusing what’s easy to measure with what actually matters.


Star ratings, patient satisfaction scores, and online reviews have become the scoreboard—but they were never designed to measure true clinical excellence.

So what happens when the proxy becomes the point?


???? What You’ll Learn:

  • Why high ratings don’t always mean high-quality care
  • How healthcare drifted toward convenience metrics
  • The unintended consequences of optimizing for satisfaction
  • What better measurement could look like
  • How clinic owners and clinicians should think differently


????️ Guest:

Larry Benz is a physical therapist and founder of Confluent Health and Evidence In Motion. He’s spent his career building and scaling healthcare organizations—and challenging the assumptions behind how success is measured.


???? Connect & Subscribe:


<p>This episode is part of the <a href="/physical-therapy-business-podcast">Physical Therapy Business Podcast</a>, where physical therapists and clinic owners learn how to get more patients, improve operations, and grow their clinic without relying only on referrals.</p>

<p>Looking for more episodes? Explore the full <a href="/physical-therapy-business-podcast">Physical Therapy Business Podcast</a> for real-world strategies on physical therapy marketing, patient acquisition, and clinic growth.</p>

Transcript
WEBVTT

00:00:00.070 --> 00:00:00.718
No problem.

00:00:01.843 --> 00:00:02.863
And are we starting with the article?

00:00:02.923 --> 00:00:03.984
I don't remember what we just said.

00:00:04.105 --> 00:00:04.264
Yeah,

00:00:04.285 --> 00:00:05.445
I was going to do the article first.

00:00:05.464 --> 00:00:05.945
Yeah, perfect.

00:00:06.506 --> 00:00:07.966
Yeah.

00:00:08.026 --> 00:00:08.207
All right.

00:00:08.246 --> 00:00:10.489
Most health care businesses have a number

00:00:11.028 --> 00:00:13.029
they're proud of, a number they show off,

00:00:13.189 --> 00:00:14.031
a number they track,

00:00:14.230 --> 00:00:17.292
a number they think proves they're doing

00:00:17.373 --> 00:00:17.833
good work.

00:00:18.493 --> 00:00:20.135
Larry's argument in his latest article,

00:00:20.495 --> 00:00:22.957
that number might be completely

00:00:22.977 --> 00:00:23.516
meaningless.

00:00:24.018 --> 00:00:24.178
Today,

00:00:24.198 --> 00:00:25.318
we're talking about one of the most

00:00:25.439 --> 00:00:27.600
visible metrics in health care.

00:00:28.239 --> 00:00:30.181
Google reviews, five stars.

00:00:31.109 --> 00:00:32.869
Zero outcomes?

00:00:32.990 --> 00:00:33.850
Welcome to The Operator,

00:00:33.890 --> 00:00:35.530
a show about running better healthcare

00:00:35.549 --> 00:00:36.831
businesses, not from theory,

00:00:37.331 --> 00:00:39.131
from people actually doing the work.

00:00:39.192 --> 00:00:40.692
If you're responsible for patients,

00:00:40.771 --> 00:00:44.213
people, or performance, this is for you.

00:00:44.292 --> 00:00:45.573
Larry, welcome to your show.

00:00:45.594 --> 00:00:47.533
Well, thank you, Jerry.

00:00:47.594 --> 00:00:48.914
Thank you for hosting my show.

00:00:50.286 --> 00:00:50.426
Well,

00:00:50.466 --> 00:00:51.826
my job is to sort of set you

00:00:51.947 --> 00:00:52.106
up.

00:00:52.226 --> 00:00:55.207
This is the last part in a series

00:00:55.228 --> 00:00:56.048
that you've been doing.

00:00:56.067 --> 00:00:57.167
And if people want to go back to

00:00:57.228 --> 00:00:57.328
it,

00:00:57.648 --> 00:00:59.689
we'll give the link to the sub stack

00:00:59.709 --> 00:01:00.829
that they can view as well as the

00:01:00.868 --> 00:01:01.829
articles on LinkedIn.

00:01:02.530 --> 00:01:02.990
But first,

00:01:03.329 --> 00:01:04.650
why did you decide to do sort of

00:01:04.670 --> 00:01:05.790
a series on metrics?

00:01:06.031 --> 00:01:07.590
What about that made you say,

00:01:07.611 --> 00:01:09.391
I'm going to dedicate several weeks of my

00:01:09.492 --> 00:01:11.611
writing to just metrics in general before

00:01:11.652 --> 00:01:13.733
we get into the specific Google reviews?

00:01:14.379 --> 00:01:15.099
Yeah.

00:01:15.120 --> 00:01:17.141
What we tend to do in an operating

00:01:17.180 --> 00:01:19.141
business and health care platforms is we

00:01:19.201 --> 00:01:21.942
tend to get very routinized on certain

00:01:22.003 --> 00:01:23.962
metrics that are like sacred cows.

00:01:23.983 --> 00:01:26.084
They're the belief that they are the most

00:01:26.123 --> 00:01:27.043
important ones.

00:01:27.885 --> 00:01:29.644
We've had vast changes in our operating

00:01:29.685 --> 00:01:30.225
environment.

00:01:30.266 --> 00:01:32.046
If you think of sort of the post-COVID

00:01:32.066 --> 00:01:32.927
hangover days,

00:01:32.947 --> 00:01:34.706
then you had shortages and you had all

00:01:34.746 --> 00:01:36.427
the headwinds of reimbursement.

00:01:37.188 --> 00:01:39.530
and all the things around high inflation.

00:01:40.251 --> 00:01:42.753
And the business models have had to

00:01:42.793 --> 00:01:43.153
change.

00:01:43.174 --> 00:01:44.254
You've had to adjust.

00:01:44.314 --> 00:01:46.917
And so what we tend not to do

00:01:47.177 --> 00:01:49.739
in health care operations is rethink,

00:01:50.140 --> 00:01:51.540
challenge our assumptions.

00:01:52.302 --> 00:01:52.641
And say,

00:01:52.742 --> 00:01:55.063
why are we continuing to measure that?

00:01:55.263 --> 00:01:57.346
And then the objective becomes the

00:01:57.406 --> 00:01:59.406
measurement rather than the activities and

00:01:59.427 --> 00:02:01.868
the behaviors that really get the

00:02:01.968 --> 00:02:03.989
operations flowing in the right direction.

00:02:04.531 --> 00:02:06.632
And so I've tried to on each one

00:02:06.671 --> 00:02:07.852
of these metrics doesn't mean,

00:02:08.112 --> 00:02:09.253
as I point out in the articles,

00:02:09.274 --> 00:02:10.735
that you shouldn't be measuring them,

00:02:10.794 --> 00:02:12.796
but you should be understanding how

00:02:12.836 --> 00:02:14.298
they've shifted over the years.

00:02:15.157 --> 00:02:18.020
And the whole area around good hearts is

00:02:18.080 --> 00:02:20.222
a bias that we tend to default in

00:02:20.282 --> 00:02:21.703
over time if we're not careful.

00:02:22.164 --> 00:02:22.384
Yeah.

00:02:22.425 --> 00:02:25.586
When the metric becomes the measure,

00:02:25.687 --> 00:02:27.487
it fails to measure what matters is the

00:02:27.527 --> 00:02:28.848
thing that kept sticking with me.

00:02:29.229 --> 00:02:29.889
That makes sense.

00:02:29.929 --> 00:02:30.569
I mean, you're Russian.

00:02:31.110 --> 00:02:31.911
If you want to go back and read

00:02:31.931 --> 00:02:31.991
it,

00:02:32.031 --> 00:02:34.412
the Russian nail factory sort of

00:02:34.512 --> 00:02:35.812
highlights that pretty well.

00:02:35.893 --> 00:02:37.473
When you tell me to gamify,

00:02:37.493 --> 00:02:39.594
when you gamify a metric and you put

00:02:39.634 --> 00:02:42.195
my salary on the on the line for

00:02:42.216 --> 00:02:42.477
that,

00:02:42.616 --> 00:02:44.176
guess what I get really good at hitting

00:02:44.197 --> 00:02:46.399
that number is the letter of the metric

00:02:46.459 --> 00:02:47.860
or the spirit of the metric.

00:02:47.879 --> 00:02:48.000
Well,

00:02:48.020 --> 00:02:49.120
I hit the letter of the metric and

00:02:49.139 --> 00:02:50.221
that's what gets me the paycheck.

00:02:51.002 --> 00:02:52.944
Just to that point, years ago,

00:02:53.465 --> 00:02:55.506
I'm going back into the late eighties.

00:02:56.426 --> 00:02:58.027
I had a few clinics and one of

00:02:58.048 --> 00:02:58.709
my clinics,

00:02:59.149 --> 00:03:01.250
we used to measure no-show cancellation

00:03:01.290 --> 00:03:03.331
rate and used to incentivize the front

00:03:03.372 --> 00:03:05.212
desk person for a lower no-show

00:03:05.252 --> 00:03:06.093
cancellation rate.

00:03:07.250 --> 00:03:08.129
And interesting,

00:03:08.169 --> 00:03:09.670
she went on maternity leave and she was

00:03:09.691 --> 00:03:11.931
a wonderful intake coordinator

00:03:11.951 --> 00:03:12.532
receptionist,

00:03:12.572 --> 00:03:14.073
what we called DOFI at the time,

00:03:14.092 --> 00:03:15.394
Director of First Impressions.

00:03:16.054 --> 00:03:16.593
And all of a sudden,

00:03:16.693 --> 00:03:19.414
our no-show cancellation went sky high.

00:03:19.914 --> 00:03:20.855
And I started wondering,

00:03:20.895 --> 00:03:21.996
how is that the case?

00:03:22.056 --> 00:03:22.997
Well, as it turns out,

00:03:23.037 --> 00:03:24.437
you can game that number.

00:03:24.516 --> 00:03:26.177
It's no different than the Russian nail

00:03:26.217 --> 00:03:26.698
factory.

00:03:27.139 --> 00:03:27.878
Somebody cancels,

00:03:27.899 --> 00:03:29.158
you just take them off the schedule and

00:03:29.199 --> 00:03:30.780
put them somewhere else and you never were

00:03:30.900 --> 00:03:32.401
able to see what really...

00:03:33.020 --> 00:03:33.681
happen there.

00:03:34.081 --> 00:03:36.122
And so gamesmanship working around it,

00:03:36.582 --> 00:03:40.246
our tax laws are the absolute, you know,

00:03:40.306 --> 00:03:42.568
personification of good hearts law,

00:03:42.668 --> 00:03:45.789
everybody works around the tax laws to try

00:03:45.810 --> 00:03:46.931
and save on their taxes.

00:03:46.971 --> 00:03:47.890
That's normal.

00:03:47.911 --> 00:03:47.991
Yeah.

00:03:48.812 --> 00:03:49.953
So we have to, you know,

00:03:49.992 --> 00:03:51.954
we have too many tax law issues,

00:03:52.354 --> 00:03:54.295
and good heart issues in operation.

00:03:54.716 --> 00:03:56.537
And so my challenge is somebody who's in

00:03:56.576 --> 00:03:59.179
the field every day operating is for us

00:03:59.199 --> 00:04:00.340
to challenge those assumptions.

00:04:00.659 --> 00:04:03.002
And you can tell which side of the

00:04:03.042 --> 00:04:04.503
argument someone is on with taxes when

00:04:04.524 --> 00:04:06.906
they call it a write-off or a loophole.

00:04:06.985 --> 00:04:07.826
If it's a loophole,

00:04:07.847 --> 00:04:09.829
you can tell they don't agree with it

00:04:09.868 --> 00:04:10.269
right there.

00:04:10.288 --> 00:04:12.270
All right, so let's jump into this.

00:04:12.671 --> 00:04:15.835
If someone logs on Google website,

00:04:15.935 --> 00:04:17.797
somewhere where ratings are being

00:04:18.036 --> 00:04:19.699
tabulated and shown off,

00:04:20.617 --> 00:04:23.218
what is a four point nine star four

00:04:23.259 --> 00:04:25.139
point out of five star rating actually

00:04:25.180 --> 00:04:28.300
tell you about specifically a health care

00:04:28.321 --> 00:04:30.322
business yeah honestly it tells you that

00:04:30.362 --> 00:04:32.603
they're good at asking that's not nothing

00:04:32.622 --> 00:04:35.324
not what most operators think it is you

00:04:35.343 --> 00:04:37.264
know four point nine means your patients

00:04:37.485 --> 00:04:39.446
felt well enough to leave a review that

00:04:39.485 --> 00:04:41.326
had a positive enough experience to give

00:04:41.346 --> 00:04:42.487
you close to a five star

00:04:43.067 --> 00:04:44.927
does not tell you about the patient who

00:04:44.968 --> 00:04:46.848
dropped off after the two to three visit

00:04:46.887 --> 00:04:49.088
cliff in physical therapy or in dental it

00:04:49.149 --> 00:04:50.410
doesn't tell you the patient who didn't

00:04:50.430 --> 00:04:52.329
show up for the second visit which

00:04:52.389 --> 00:04:54.490
oftentimes in dental is the most important

00:04:54.550 --> 00:04:57.512
visit from an economic standpoint it

00:04:57.552 --> 00:04:59.112
doesn't tell you about your twenty two day

00:04:59.153 --> 00:05:00.872
wait period for a new evaluation it

00:05:00.892 --> 00:05:02.293
doesn't tell you whether your functional

00:05:02.334 --> 00:05:04.173
outcomes improved or whether your hygiene

00:05:04.194 --> 00:05:05.814
appointment rate is collapsing

00:05:06.875 --> 00:05:09.418
It's a sentiment snapshot from a very

00:05:09.497 --> 00:05:11.060
self-directed audience.

00:05:11.160 --> 00:05:11.860
And in health care,

00:05:11.899 --> 00:05:14.903
that audience skews very grateful,

00:05:15.062 --> 00:05:16.343
skews compliance,

00:05:16.363 --> 00:05:18.165
skews towards the people who finished

00:05:18.225 --> 00:05:20.307
care, the people who like you.

00:05:20.367 --> 00:05:21.708
The four point nine is real.

00:05:21.728 --> 00:05:22.809
It's just not the whole story.

00:05:22.829 --> 00:05:24.990
It might not even be the important or

00:05:25.391 --> 00:05:26.992
really key elements of the story.

00:05:27.389 --> 00:05:28.649
Yeah, you want to gamify that number.

00:05:29.329 --> 00:05:31.512
Don't point out where to scan the QR

00:05:31.531 --> 00:05:32.793
code to leave a review to somebody who's

00:05:32.833 --> 00:05:33.774
disgruntled, right?

00:05:34.935 --> 00:05:36.216
Although you can look at the other side

00:05:36.235 --> 00:05:36.735
of the argument,

00:05:36.755 --> 00:05:38.716
which is sometimes when people have a bad

00:05:38.757 --> 00:05:39.298
experience,

00:05:39.317 --> 00:05:41.839
they're more likely to go rate you and

00:05:41.899 --> 00:05:44.120
leave a review versus the people who are

00:05:44.161 --> 00:05:45.603
the silent, happy,

00:05:46.242 --> 00:05:48.524
satisfied customer or patient.

00:05:49.004 --> 00:05:49.444
Exactly.

00:05:49.786 --> 00:05:50.665
And it has some meaning.

00:05:50.706 --> 00:05:52.848
It's just not all that much important from

00:05:52.887 --> 00:05:53.908
the day-to-day operations.

00:05:54.048 --> 00:05:54.288
Right.

00:05:54.588 --> 00:05:56.230
So at what point did healthcare cross the

00:05:56.250 --> 00:05:58.512
line from measuring experience to

00:05:58.591 --> 00:06:02.214
pretending experience equals quality?

00:06:02.877 --> 00:06:03.017
Yeah,

00:06:03.038 --> 00:06:04.358
so we gotta go back a little bit

00:06:04.858 --> 00:06:05.959
in place of time.

00:06:06.098 --> 00:06:08.339
In the, call it the late eighties,

00:06:08.480 --> 00:06:09.319
early nineties,

00:06:09.360 --> 00:06:10.940
there was this new thing that happened in

00:06:10.980 --> 00:06:12.822
healthcare called functional outcome

00:06:12.862 --> 00:06:17.163
measures, SF-II, the SF-XXVI, short form,

00:06:17.223 --> 00:06:18.363
long form, XXXVI,

00:06:18.384 --> 00:06:20.925
which is the healthcare quality of life.

00:06:20.964 --> 00:06:21.884
And so we started to say,

00:06:21.985 --> 00:06:23.466
what do outcomes mean?

00:06:24.026 --> 00:06:25.966
And outcomes were defined as days,

00:06:26.026 --> 00:06:29.427
dollars, utilization, functional outcome,

00:06:30.404 --> 00:06:31.305
And on top of that,

00:06:31.345 --> 00:06:32.985
we had patient satisfaction,

00:06:33.065 --> 00:06:35.307
later became patient experience.

00:06:35.346 --> 00:06:37.168
And so the combination of these dollars

00:06:37.228 --> 00:06:38.749
are sort of utilization-driven data,

00:06:39.009 --> 00:06:40.889
clinical functional outcome-driven data,

00:06:41.509 --> 00:06:43.870
and all the things around the experience

00:06:43.911 --> 00:06:46.132
became sort of the three distinct domains.

00:06:47.692 --> 00:06:49.134
But what happened is over time,

00:06:49.153 --> 00:06:50.413
we've tried to simplify it.

00:06:50.434 --> 00:06:50.615
You know,

00:06:50.634 --> 00:06:52.196
we're in business and operations.

00:06:52.255 --> 00:06:54.497
We're always trying to make the complex

00:06:54.576 --> 00:06:56.718
simple from an operation standpoint.

00:06:56.879 --> 00:06:58.040
That's a great thing.

00:06:58.279 --> 00:06:58.720
However,

00:06:58.800 --> 00:07:01.281
sometimes when we make things so simple,

00:07:01.322 --> 00:07:04.663
we destroy what the animal that we're

00:07:04.684 --> 00:07:05.625
trying to create is.

00:07:05.704 --> 00:07:07.386
So the moment we ran out of better

00:07:07.425 --> 00:07:09.627
alternatives and stopped admitting it,

00:07:09.666 --> 00:07:11.528
clinical outcome measurements in the most

00:07:11.608 --> 00:07:14.571
outpatient settings is inconsistent at

00:07:14.630 --> 00:07:16.232
best, absent at worst.

00:07:16.831 --> 00:07:19.774
Functional tools do exist, photo, promise,

00:07:20.653 --> 00:07:22.274
all the things are on Medicare, you know,

00:07:22.334 --> 00:07:24.976
PSFS, for example, but adoption is not,

00:07:25.317 --> 00:07:27.197
you know, is not evenly put.

00:07:28.059 --> 00:07:28.819
And at times,

00:07:28.858 --> 00:07:30.579
we tend to only do it on our

00:07:30.620 --> 00:07:33.041
best patients or those who complete care.

00:07:33.062 --> 00:07:34.062
And so you have to be really,

00:07:34.101 --> 00:07:34.802
really careful.

00:07:35.764 --> 00:07:37.644
And so what fills that volume,

00:07:37.665 --> 00:07:39.646
whatever is visible and Google stars are

00:07:39.846 --> 00:07:40.406
everywhere.

00:07:40.447 --> 00:07:42.149
And so let's use Google stars.

00:07:42.329 --> 00:07:44.411
I had series a couple of weeks ago

00:07:44.451 --> 00:07:45.872
about Net Promoter Score,

00:07:45.891 --> 00:07:47.353
a lot of similarities here.

00:07:47.694 --> 00:07:48.694
They're on your profile,

00:07:48.713 --> 00:07:49.935
they show up in the listing,

00:07:49.954 --> 00:07:51.737
they're a number, numbers feel like data.

00:07:51.797 --> 00:07:52.838
So we promote them,

00:07:52.918 --> 00:07:54.439
not because anyone made a deliberate

00:07:54.899 --> 00:07:55.839
decision about it,

00:07:55.879 --> 00:07:57.961
but that four point nine stars equals

00:07:58.002 --> 00:07:58.862
clinical excellence.

00:07:58.882 --> 00:08:00.884
Somehow or another, we conflated that.

00:08:01.725 --> 00:08:03.206
But because the infrastructure for

00:08:03.247 --> 00:08:05.829
measuring actual clinical excellence

00:08:05.910 --> 00:08:08.411
wasn't there or wasn't fulsome or wasn't

00:08:08.451 --> 00:08:11.214
complete, the proxy became the point.

00:08:11.615 --> 00:08:13.257
And that's always how it happens.

00:08:13.336 --> 00:08:16.019
We make a proxy a conclusion,

00:08:16.160 --> 00:08:18.161
and Google stars are now that conclusion,

00:08:18.182 --> 00:08:18.442
unfortunately.

00:08:19.511 --> 00:08:19.690
Yeah.

00:08:20.230 --> 00:08:21.732
It's funny that you bring up four point

00:08:21.791 --> 00:08:22.552
nine stars.

00:08:22.752 --> 00:08:23.833
And I think I know why.

00:08:24.153 --> 00:08:26.935
To me, five feels too perfect.

00:08:27.035 --> 00:08:29.255
It feels like I can't trust that because

00:08:29.295 --> 00:08:30.896
it's nothing's perfect.

00:08:30.937 --> 00:08:32.557
So four point nine feels as close as

00:08:32.577 --> 00:08:33.198
you can get.

00:08:33.558 --> 00:08:34.099
Really good.

00:08:34.119 --> 00:08:35.480
But obviously there's some real in there.

00:08:35.539 --> 00:08:36.480
So it matters.

00:08:37.160 --> 00:08:38.841
Isn't that funny how that like we've even

00:08:39.042 --> 00:08:40.722
even on the receiving end said five's too

00:08:40.743 --> 00:08:40.863
good.

00:08:40.883 --> 00:08:41.562
I don't trust it.

00:08:42.163 --> 00:08:43.783
A four point eight that four point nine

00:08:43.803 --> 00:08:45.125
that feels perfect.

00:08:45.325 --> 00:08:46.506
More authentic.

00:08:46.667 --> 00:08:47.327
Feels more authentic.

00:08:47.488 --> 00:08:47.807
Right.

00:08:47.908 --> 00:08:49.529
Right.

00:08:49.570 --> 00:08:51.832
So you mentioned like sort of the

00:08:51.893 --> 00:08:52.874
pre-COVID, right?

00:08:52.913 --> 00:08:56.118
So are operators still chasing Google

00:08:56.158 --> 00:08:57.500
reviews based on a version of the

00:08:57.539 --> 00:08:58.701
algorithm that doesn't actually exist?

00:08:58.821 --> 00:09:00.864
Are we still having a twenty sixteen

00:09:00.923 --> 00:09:03.086
mindset in twenty twenty six?

00:09:03.806 --> 00:09:05.106
No, that's absolutely right.

00:09:05.226 --> 00:09:06.048
A lot of them are.

00:09:06.067 --> 00:09:07.729
And that's really what my research started

00:09:07.769 --> 00:09:08.249
to show,

00:09:08.328 --> 00:09:09.889
that the old mental model was pretty

00:09:09.929 --> 00:09:10.250
simple.

00:09:10.311 --> 00:09:12.312
More five star reviews equals higher

00:09:12.491 --> 00:09:14.474
ranking equals more patients.

00:09:14.573 --> 00:09:16.475
So it was all driven by how high

00:09:16.514 --> 00:09:17.115
on the Google

00:09:17.932 --> 00:09:19.913
best search engine, period.

00:09:19.932 --> 00:09:20.514
It's interesting.

00:09:20.533 --> 00:09:22.174
We're switching now from search engine to

00:09:22.355 --> 00:09:24.395
AI, LLL.

00:09:25.355 --> 00:09:25.996
And for a while,

00:09:26.037 --> 00:09:29.879
the volume of reviews was the dominant SEO

00:09:29.979 --> 00:09:30.339
signal.

00:09:30.360 --> 00:09:32.020
And this really is the main teaching point

00:09:32.061 --> 00:09:32.681
of the article.

00:09:33.020 --> 00:09:34.461
So that logic held true.

00:09:34.501 --> 00:09:36.903
But the algorithm has gotten way more

00:09:36.962 --> 00:09:38.884
sophisticated, as they always do.

00:09:38.945 --> 00:09:41.446
Technology always outpaces everything we

00:09:41.485 --> 00:09:42.287
do in health care.

00:09:42.907 --> 00:09:45.067
proximity, relevance, behavior signals,

00:09:45.087 --> 00:09:46.730
how people interact with your listing,

00:09:46.769 --> 00:09:48.291
whether they click, whether they call,

00:09:48.691 --> 00:09:50.432
these matter now as well.

00:09:50.631 --> 00:09:52.133
So it's the behavioral elements,

00:09:52.212 --> 00:09:53.833
not just the star elements.

00:09:54.455 --> 00:09:56.596
Review recency matters more than raw

00:09:56.635 --> 00:09:57.135
volume.

00:09:57.476 --> 00:09:59.998
So if you took a hundred reviews,

00:10:00.457 --> 00:10:02.200
it's like golf handicap system.

00:10:02.240 --> 00:10:04.441
It's the five top most recent ones that

00:10:04.500 --> 00:10:05.461
really matter.

00:10:06.001 --> 00:10:08.325
So the operators who ran an aggressive,

00:10:08.365 --> 00:10:10.447
let's get to two hundred review campaigns.

00:10:10.626 --> 00:10:12.769
I still see this all the time.

00:10:12.849 --> 00:10:15.052
And they sort of stop.

00:10:15.552 --> 00:10:16.893
They're potentially losing ground to a

00:10:16.952 --> 00:10:18.335
competitor with eighty reviews.

00:10:18.375 --> 00:10:19.615
So that was kind of like I got

00:10:19.676 --> 00:10:20.096
two hundred.

00:10:20.116 --> 00:10:20.756
You got eighty.

00:10:20.797 --> 00:10:21.778
So therefore, I'm better.

00:10:22.119 --> 00:10:24.421
In fact, we are competitiveness.

00:10:25.302 --> 00:10:27.863
around google stars surpassed our

00:10:27.883 --> 00:10:29.764
competitiveness around clinical excellence

00:10:29.803 --> 00:10:31.264
and doing the right thing for the patient

00:10:31.365 --> 00:10:33.485
right you know the we got we got

00:10:33.546 --> 00:10:36.347
diverted by all this um so chasing the

00:10:36.388 --> 00:10:38.489
number at one time made sense now it's

00:10:38.649 --> 00:10:41.311
it's it's table stakes and the operators

00:10:41.350 --> 00:10:43.152
treating it like it's a competitive moat

00:10:43.312 --> 00:10:45.413
are you know probably optimizing for a

00:10:45.493 --> 00:10:47.533
version of local search that's already

00:10:47.573 --> 00:10:49.475
moved way way past that right you know

00:10:49.514 --> 00:10:51.035
by the way at least in physical therapy

00:10:51.615 --> 00:10:53.155
Why do we care about local surgery much?

00:10:53.176 --> 00:10:54.596
Don't we have we have plenty of patients

00:10:54.616 --> 00:10:56.596
now, plenty of volume.

00:10:56.616 --> 00:10:56.876
Yeah.

00:10:56.976 --> 00:10:58.996
You know, really optimizing,

00:10:59.037 --> 00:11:00.217
as we talked about last week,

00:11:00.278 --> 00:11:03.298
optimizing that volume and not the churn

00:11:04.357 --> 00:11:05.499
is really, really important.

00:11:05.519 --> 00:11:07.239
So keeping the patients you have and what

00:11:07.259 --> 00:11:09.479
we're saying, milking your own cows first,

00:11:09.538 --> 00:11:10.639
you have those patients.

00:11:11.220 --> 00:11:12.740
Make sure you're getting the treatment

00:11:12.779 --> 00:11:15.559
completion on them so that you can focus

00:11:15.600 --> 00:11:16.561
attention on there.

00:11:16.600 --> 00:11:18.480
And that's where that, you know, really

00:11:19.360 --> 00:11:20.562
being extremely,

00:11:20.662 --> 00:11:22.923
extremely intentional about visit two and

00:11:22.942 --> 00:11:25.303
three and showing value there rather than

00:11:25.403 --> 00:11:26.524
routinize the visit.

00:11:27.184 --> 00:11:28.485
What you're basically saying to the

00:11:28.524 --> 00:11:29.706
patient is you don't need to come in

00:11:29.725 --> 00:11:30.907
anymore because we're going to do the same

00:11:30.927 --> 00:11:31.687
thing every time.

00:11:32.106 --> 00:11:32.586
Yep.

00:11:32.746 --> 00:11:35.408
I can actually hear someone creating a KPI

00:11:35.448 --> 00:11:36.089
just for that.

00:11:36.129 --> 00:11:37.490
But isn't there one?

00:11:37.610 --> 00:11:38.309
Isn't it churn?

00:11:38.330 --> 00:11:39.791
So when you don't have real clinical

00:11:39.870 --> 00:11:42.532
outcome data, what does fill that gap?

00:11:42.871 --> 00:11:44.753
What is the right thing or the better

00:11:44.812 --> 00:11:46.153
thing to measure?

00:11:47.408 --> 00:11:48.210
Yeah,

00:11:50.552 --> 00:11:52.154
so what happens is we use Google Deck,

00:11:52.395 --> 00:11:53.116
Google Stars,

00:11:53.417 --> 00:11:55.919
and Net Promoter Scores because leadership

00:11:55.980 --> 00:11:57.863
needs something to say in a board deck.

00:11:58.583 --> 00:12:00.304
And this is a different topic for another

00:12:00.345 --> 00:12:01.485
time, but I think, you know,

00:12:01.544 --> 00:12:04.485
PE backed platforms and even private

00:12:04.546 --> 00:12:07.927
practices do not have the right type of

00:12:07.966 --> 00:12:08.706
board members.

00:12:08.746 --> 00:12:11.067
They have people playing by old rules of

00:12:11.107 --> 00:12:13.129
an old game, a, you know,

00:12:13.168 --> 00:12:15.808
call it college before we professionalize

00:12:15.828 --> 00:12:17.529
through revenue share and NIL.

00:12:17.570 --> 00:12:19.831
That's the type of people that are on

00:12:19.931 --> 00:12:22.250
boards right now is this new game that

00:12:22.291 --> 00:12:23.792
took place post COVID.

00:12:24.692 --> 00:12:26.754
You show me an operator who's really done

00:12:26.815 --> 00:12:28.475
well the last few years and you've got

00:12:28.535 --> 00:12:30.778
an operator because they they're the ones

00:12:30.798 --> 00:12:32.721
who've dealt with incredible amounts of

00:12:32.780 --> 00:12:34.383
inflation at the supply level,

00:12:34.442 --> 00:12:36.325
inflation at the compensation level,

00:12:36.365 --> 00:12:38.047
shortages of your suppliers,

00:12:38.606 --> 00:12:40.089
all of those kinds of things.

00:12:40.950 --> 00:12:42.770
And so we use Google stars and net

00:12:42.812 --> 00:12:44.854
promoter scores for those board members

00:12:44.894 --> 00:12:46.315
because we want to fill a board deck.

00:12:46.335 --> 00:12:47.035
It sounds cynical.

00:12:47.135 --> 00:12:49.398
but it's accurate organizations under

00:12:49.457 --> 00:12:51.460
performance pressure from either PE

00:12:51.539 --> 00:12:51.840
owners,

00:12:51.879 --> 00:12:53.841
from franchise benchmarks from year over

00:12:53.922 --> 00:12:56.283
year need visible proof of quality.

00:12:56.644 --> 00:12:59.527
And so this proxy of Google stars is

00:12:59.626 --> 00:13:02.889
now what your compliance is showing up as

00:13:02.950 --> 00:13:03.350
quality.

00:13:03.370 --> 00:13:04.552
And if you can't pull functional

00:13:04.572 --> 00:13:06.232
improvement data, very hard to do,

00:13:06.273 --> 00:13:06.693
as you know,

00:13:07.114 --> 00:13:08.575
If your outcome tool adoption is

00:13:08.654 --> 00:13:09.355
inconsistent,

00:13:09.375 --> 00:13:10.875
it's very hard to be consistent.

00:13:11.196 --> 00:13:13.517
If your discharge documentation is a mess,

00:13:13.756 --> 00:13:15.758
very hard to have that consistent as well

00:13:16.077 --> 00:13:19.740
because most patients don't read their end

00:13:19.799 --> 00:13:21.179
of treatment discharge.

00:13:21.500 --> 00:13:22.841
You reach the number you have.

00:13:22.900 --> 00:13:24.182
Google stars makes it easy.

00:13:24.241 --> 00:13:26.001
Net promoter scores make it easier.

00:13:26.062 --> 00:13:27.842
Patient satisfaction makes it easier.

00:13:28.062 --> 00:13:29.163
Those aren't bad metrics.

00:13:29.183 --> 00:13:30.923
They're just getting asked to carry weight

00:13:30.943 --> 00:13:31.804
they weren't built for.

00:13:32.985 --> 00:13:34.826
The danger isn't that operators track

00:13:34.846 --> 00:13:34.986
them.

00:13:35.027 --> 00:13:36.368
The danger is that over time,

00:13:36.388 --> 00:13:38.528
the proxy becomes the definition.

00:13:38.568 --> 00:13:39.370
You stop asking,

00:13:39.389 --> 00:13:40.571
are patients getting better?

00:13:40.870 --> 00:13:41.652
And start asking,

00:13:41.751 --> 00:13:43.293
are patients happy enough to leave a

00:13:43.312 --> 00:13:44.133
five-star review?

00:13:44.153 --> 00:13:46.654
That's entirely different dimensions.

00:13:47.034 --> 00:13:47.716
They're related,

00:13:48.216 --> 00:13:49.596
but they're not the same questions.

00:13:49.777 --> 00:13:50.738
Yeah.

00:13:50.778 --> 00:13:52.698
You highlighted something in this article

00:13:52.759 --> 00:13:54.580
that I guess I didn't think about too

00:13:54.620 --> 00:13:54.941
much.

00:13:55.581 --> 00:13:56.601
And I bet you a lot of people

00:13:56.642 --> 00:13:57.222
didn't either,

00:13:57.263 --> 00:13:59.945
which is responding to one of these

00:13:59.985 --> 00:14:02.366
reviews, if it's negative or in a way,

00:14:02.788 --> 00:14:04.708
could open you up to liability.

00:14:05.370 --> 00:14:08.393
So why are healthcare providers the only

00:14:08.432 --> 00:14:10.335
businesses that really can't actually

00:14:10.355 --> 00:14:11.716
defend themselves in public?

00:14:11.775 --> 00:14:12.355
Or they can,

00:14:12.375 --> 00:14:13.658
but they have to be really,

00:14:14.018 --> 00:14:15.139
really careful about it.

00:14:15.447 --> 00:14:15.667
Yeah.

00:14:15.706 --> 00:14:16.187
So first of all,

00:14:16.206 --> 00:14:17.908
the reviews tend to reflect sort of your

00:14:17.988 --> 00:14:20.908
interpersonal and logistical experience as

00:14:20.948 --> 00:14:22.288
your wait times, your parking,

00:14:22.328 --> 00:14:23.089
the front desk,

00:14:23.448 --> 00:14:25.210
not clinical decision making.

00:14:25.610 --> 00:14:28.171
And so the population leaving reviews is

00:14:28.270 --> 00:14:30.711
really not a representative population.

00:14:31.851 --> 00:14:34.354
people are complex they leave incomplete

00:14:34.835 --> 00:14:37.557
survey data disappointing outcomes are

00:14:37.596 --> 00:14:39.938
less likely to review stars of any any

00:14:40.620 --> 00:14:43.162
nature at all and what ends up happening

00:14:43.442 --> 00:14:45.283
is it's you know do you like your

00:14:45.323 --> 00:14:47.285
provider all those kind of things they

00:14:47.346 --> 00:14:50.028
review it but that selection bias is baked

00:14:50.087 --> 00:14:52.870
into every star rating in the industry

00:14:53.629 --> 00:14:55.089
But the biggest thing is what you're

00:14:55.129 --> 00:14:56.330
referring to on the question,

00:14:56.350 --> 00:14:58.951
which has HIPAA in the background,

00:14:58.971 --> 00:15:01.171
which limits how providers can respond to

00:15:01.230 --> 00:15:02.270
negative reviews.

00:15:02.611 --> 00:15:04.011
You can't get into details.

00:15:04.052 --> 00:15:05.412
You can't correct the record.

00:15:05.451 --> 00:15:07.133
You can't explain context.

00:15:07.673 --> 00:15:09.754
So one-star review about a billing dispute

00:15:09.793 --> 00:15:11.274
sits on your profile essentially

00:15:11.333 --> 00:15:13.335
unchallenged because your response has to

00:15:13.375 --> 00:15:14.215
be generic.

00:15:14.875 --> 00:15:17.618
It lands and people people ignore that.

00:15:17.658 --> 00:15:19.259
And so now we've developed this whole

00:15:19.278 --> 00:15:21.120
niche industry about how to respond to

00:15:21.160 --> 00:15:22.423
bad, bad reviews.

00:15:22.462 --> 00:15:23.764
It's almost like all of us need our

00:15:23.803 --> 00:15:26.326
own PR crisis when we get a bad

00:15:27.047 --> 00:15:27.508
review.

00:15:28.268 --> 00:15:30.210
We also have to remember, you know,

00:15:30.471 --> 00:15:32.432
I always tell my therapist this and the

00:15:32.493 --> 00:15:34.073
PT side and I say the same thing

00:15:34.094 --> 00:15:34.595
in the dental.

00:15:34.654 --> 00:15:37.376
If a patient left your local clinic.

00:15:38.097 --> 00:15:40.840
because they refused to accept some level

00:15:40.879 --> 00:15:43.182
of self-responsibility in physical therapy

00:15:43.201 --> 00:15:45.864
that manifests itself by a home program or

00:15:45.903 --> 00:15:47.625
compliance with instructions.

00:15:48.206 --> 00:15:48.787
And in dental,

00:15:48.826 --> 00:15:50.727
it manifests itself with compliance with

00:15:50.788 --> 00:15:52.970
instructions on hygiene care and other

00:15:53.129 --> 00:15:55.831
aspects of post procedural care.

00:15:56.393 --> 00:15:58.934
And they would not take and therefore they

00:15:58.975 --> 00:16:00.875
disliked you because they wanted to put

00:16:00.936 --> 00:16:02.256
all their problems on to you.

00:16:03.057 --> 00:16:04.899
It's OK to fire a customer every once

00:16:04.918 --> 00:16:05.359
in a while.

00:16:05.418 --> 00:16:07.600
And if that leaves you a bad review,

00:16:08.100 --> 00:16:10.260
you could still sleep at night because

00:16:10.321 --> 00:16:13.101
self-responsibility and an active role in

00:16:13.121 --> 00:16:14.042
your own health care,

00:16:14.101 --> 00:16:16.543
your own recovery and in your own in

00:16:16.562 --> 00:16:18.604
the dental world and your own treatment is

00:16:18.683 --> 00:16:19.224
critical.

00:16:19.244 --> 00:16:21.664
A lot of patients don't want to assume

00:16:21.745 --> 00:16:23.745
any responsibility and they might write

00:16:23.765 --> 00:16:24.625
you a bad review.

00:16:24.946 --> 00:16:28.106
You can't get overly intrusive on it

00:16:28.147 --> 00:16:28.767
because you're violent.

00:16:28.807 --> 00:16:29.847
You could be violating HIPAA.

00:16:30.475 --> 00:16:33.636
Yeah, it's the juice versus squeeze ratio.

00:16:34.118 --> 00:16:35.578
You might chase after and put so much

00:16:35.599 --> 00:16:36.438
effort in this one patient,

00:16:36.458 --> 00:16:37.580
you're probably never gonna make that,

00:16:38.000 --> 00:16:40.001
you might never make that person happy.

00:16:40.402 --> 00:16:42.464
Let's take that juice versus squeeze ratio

00:16:42.844 --> 00:16:43.784
over to this question,

00:16:44.184 --> 00:16:46.005
because this takes time, effort, money.

00:16:46.046 --> 00:16:48.827
There are firms who you can hire that

00:16:48.847 --> 00:16:49.849
are specialized in this.

00:16:50.288 --> 00:16:52.291
So what are people actually spending,

00:16:52.350 --> 00:16:53.451
even if you're not hiring a firm,

00:16:53.471 --> 00:16:55.352
you're also spending brainpower, time,

00:16:55.413 --> 00:16:56.653
staff time, effort, money.

00:16:56.994 --> 00:16:58.754
What are we actually spending to maintain

00:16:58.794 --> 00:16:59.035
that

00:17:01.356 --> 00:17:04.157
And has anyone proven that it does

00:17:04.198 --> 00:17:04.618
anything?

00:17:05.259 --> 00:17:07.640
Does it drive business or patient growth

00:17:07.720 --> 00:17:08.160
at all?

00:17:08.580 --> 00:17:08.740
Yeah.

00:17:08.820 --> 00:17:11.261
So one of the questions I ask operators

00:17:11.281 --> 00:17:14.223
to think about is the concept of what

00:17:14.304 --> 00:17:17.484
is your return on the cost of quality?

00:17:17.925 --> 00:17:20.446
The cost is the time, effort, resources,

00:17:20.567 --> 00:17:20.967
money,

00:17:21.507 --> 00:17:24.888
all these things we do to ensure some

00:17:24.949 --> 00:17:25.950
level of quality.

00:17:26.609 --> 00:17:28.171
And so you have to be cognizant of

00:17:28.191 --> 00:17:28.431
that.

00:17:28.911 --> 00:17:31.551
The spending is extremely real and it's

00:17:31.652 --> 00:17:33.413
often invisible in the budget.

00:17:33.893 --> 00:17:34.113
You know,

00:17:34.133 --> 00:17:35.794
people aren't you're not budgeting this as

00:17:35.834 --> 00:17:38.375
much staff time training and review

00:17:38.815 --> 00:17:41.476
technology platforms with automatic post

00:17:41.536 --> 00:17:43.016
visit review sequences.

00:17:43.076 --> 00:17:45.156
Now we have all this stuff that goes

00:17:45.217 --> 00:17:47.637
into your phone that automatically asks

00:17:47.738 --> 00:17:49.318
you all of these kinds of things.

00:17:49.939 --> 00:17:51.700
And for a multi-site operator, man,

00:17:51.740 --> 00:17:52.460
that adds up.

00:17:52.579 --> 00:17:54.461
fast and keep in mind all the SAS

00:17:54.481 --> 00:17:55.702
software providers,

00:17:55.742 --> 00:17:56.804
how do they make more money?

00:17:57.223 --> 00:18:00.146
The same customers adding additional APIs

00:18:00.547 --> 00:18:02.848
that allow you to do more functions is

00:18:02.909 --> 00:18:04.190
how they make more money.

00:18:04.250 --> 00:18:04.410
You know,

00:18:04.430 --> 00:18:06.031
we'll talk about the EMRs and other kinds

00:18:06.051 --> 00:18:08.493
of things later because the LZRs miniature

00:18:08.534 --> 00:18:09.034
versions.

00:18:09.434 --> 00:18:11.757
So now I'm not only doing your EMR,

00:18:12.217 --> 00:18:14.698
I'm doing your point of service pay at

00:18:14.758 --> 00:18:15.358
times.

00:18:15.578 --> 00:18:17.298
I'm doing your outcome studies.

00:18:17.680 --> 00:18:20.181
I'm doing your documentation AI.

00:18:20.580 --> 00:18:22.422
All of these things keep adding costs.

00:18:22.461 --> 00:18:23.682
And so we say as operators,

00:18:23.701 --> 00:18:25.303
where's my cost of RCM?

00:18:25.343 --> 00:18:26.363
Should be going down.

00:18:26.544 --> 00:18:27.523
All of a sudden it's going up.

00:18:27.544 --> 00:18:28.304
Why is it going up?

00:18:28.324 --> 00:18:29.785
Because all these providers are adding

00:18:29.884 --> 00:18:30.525
APIs.

00:18:30.805 --> 00:18:33.826
They're increasing your cost and you have

00:18:33.866 --> 00:18:35.567
to do the tough decisions and make

00:18:35.607 --> 00:18:36.048
choices.

00:18:36.528 --> 00:18:38.348
about all of those kinds of things.

00:18:38.410 --> 00:18:40.151
And so in health care,

00:18:40.171 --> 00:18:42.211
a lot of choice is constrained.

00:18:42.272 --> 00:18:44.054
Insurance networks, referral patterns,

00:18:44.094 --> 00:18:44.713
geography,

00:18:44.773 --> 00:18:46.875
they're still doing an incredible amount

00:18:46.915 --> 00:18:47.517
of routing.

00:18:47.557 --> 00:18:49.817
And so if you're investing to maintain a

00:18:49.857 --> 00:18:52.079
four point nine in a market where a

00:18:52.140 --> 00:18:53.820
meaningful portion of your new patients

00:18:53.861 --> 00:18:55.502
are coming through other referral channels

00:18:55.823 --> 00:18:57.544
that aren't looking at your Google rating

00:18:57.604 --> 00:18:57.884
at all,

00:18:57.924 --> 00:18:59.266
that doesn't mean the investment is

00:18:59.826 --> 00:19:00.226
wasted.

00:19:00.626 --> 00:19:02.867
It just means that ROI calculation is

00:19:02.948 --> 00:19:03.269
messy.

00:19:03.909 --> 00:19:06.131
They're the platform selling requests.

00:19:06.471 --> 00:19:08.553
So we see all of these efforts now

00:19:08.673 --> 00:19:11.776
in the AI world of lead generation and

00:19:11.895 --> 00:19:13.218
all of these things around it.

00:19:13.778 --> 00:19:15.759
And I talk to practices and they say,

00:19:15.779 --> 00:19:17.121
I'm not having trouble getting new

00:19:17.161 --> 00:19:18.021
patients right now.

00:19:18.442 --> 00:19:18.742
Well,

00:19:18.923 --> 00:19:20.443
you're spending an incredible amount

00:19:20.483 --> 00:19:22.445
between your foot marketers,

00:19:22.826 --> 00:19:25.308
your advertising, your digital marketing,

00:19:25.788 --> 00:19:27.430
and all of these things have accreted to

00:19:27.471 --> 00:19:27.810
a level.

00:19:27.891 --> 00:19:28.490
And you have to say,

00:19:28.530 --> 00:19:30.032
does the business model support it

00:19:30.053 --> 00:19:30.192
anymore?

00:19:31.128 --> 00:19:32.069
And in healthcare,

00:19:32.230 --> 00:19:33.612
it's a penny nickel business,

00:19:33.652 --> 00:19:34.893
a nickel dime business.

00:19:35.012 --> 00:19:38.136
You can't afford to spend an enormous

00:19:38.156 --> 00:19:39.698
amount of money on a problem that you

00:19:39.738 --> 00:19:41.099
think is there, but it really isn't.

00:19:41.519 --> 00:19:42.159
Yeah.

00:19:42.179 --> 00:19:42.359
All right.

00:19:42.380 --> 00:19:43.220
So I'm going to hold your feet to

00:19:43.259 --> 00:19:43.640
the fire.

00:19:43.819 --> 00:19:47.021
I actually put your article into test.

00:19:47.041 --> 00:19:47.382
I said, hey,

00:19:47.982 --> 00:19:51.125
how would some leading brands actually

00:19:51.244 --> 00:19:51.944
optimize this?

00:19:51.984 --> 00:19:55.686
And one of the best responses was Disney.

00:19:56.248 --> 00:19:58.848
They said Walt Disney himself would

00:19:58.929 --> 00:20:01.611
optimize for miles per hour,

00:20:01.651 --> 00:20:03.531
not miles per hour, not stars.

00:20:03.912 --> 00:20:06.012
So if Google stars don't tell the truth,

00:20:06.814 --> 00:20:08.994
what should operators be measuring

00:20:09.476 --> 00:20:10.056
instead?

00:20:10.753 --> 00:20:11.193
Yeah,

00:20:11.413 --> 00:20:13.275
so we'll get into this a little bit,

00:20:13.295 --> 00:20:14.736
but I noticed one of the comments from

00:20:14.756 --> 00:20:18.117
the article last week was somebody saying

00:20:18.137 --> 00:20:20.759
the best metric they measure is how many

00:20:20.818 --> 00:20:22.279
smiles are leaving their clinic.

00:20:22.728 --> 00:20:24.167
And I thought that was a real interesting

00:20:24.228 --> 00:20:24.728
one.

00:20:24.827 --> 00:20:26.409
In dental, at least in our company,

00:20:26.469 --> 00:20:28.009
we say our mission is to create a

00:20:28.048 --> 00:20:29.548
lifetime of healthy smiles.

00:20:29.608 --> 00:20:30.930
And how are we doing that?

00:20:30.970 --> 00:20:33.190
Doing meaningful and purposeful work and

00:20:33.230 --> 00:20:33.789
remembering.

00:20:34.230 --> 00:20:35.711
In fact, that's what we're here for.

00:20:36.310 --> 00:20:38.431
But there's a short list with teeth.

00:20:38.510 --> 00:20:41.011
New patient arrival rate is a real

00:20:41.051 --> 00:20:41.672
critical one.

00:20:41.711 --> 00:20:43.291
Are new patients choosing you?

00:20:43.811 --> 00:20:45.432
Is that number growing?

00:20:45.553 --> 00:20:47.673
Is your number of new patients growing?

00:20:48.393 --> 00:20:51.134
We talk about growth in organic and all

00:20:51.153 --> 00:20:52.253
these things and platforms,

00:20:52.273 --> 00:20:55.095
and most PT operators measure that wrong.

00:20:55.435 --> 00:20:59.757
They measure growth in terms of number of

00:20:59.797 --> 00:21:01.518
visits per patient, all kinds of things.

00:21:01.538 --> 00:21:02.998
They ought to be measuring it by growth

00:21:03.038 --> 00:21:03.798
and cash flow.

00:21:03.917 --> 00:21:05.298
Different topic for another time.

00:21:05.959 --> 00:21:06.980
But is the number growing?

00:21:07.000 --> 00:21:07.980
That's a market signal,

00:21:08.060 --> 00:21:10.123
not just a sentimental drop.

00:21:10.182 --> 00:21:11.703
PlanetCare completion, very,

00:21:11.743 --> 00:21:13.265
very difficult, but really, really,

00:21:13.605 --> 00:21:14.205
really difficult.

00:21:14.346 --> 00:21:16.448
Are patients staying through their episode

00:21:16.508 --> 00:21:17.288
of completion?

00:21:17.628 --> 00:21:19.131
To me, that would be the best proxy.

00:21:21.115 --> 00:21:23.135
of a patient you know satisfaction really

00:21:23.615 --> 00:21:25.896
because dropout is the quiet killer that a

00:21:25.957 --> 00:21:27.917
four point nine doesn't capture right

00:21:27.978 --> 00:21:30.018
functional outcome improvement discipline

00:21:30.157 --> 00:21:33.459
specific systematically collected not

00:21:33.538 --> 00:21:36.740
cherry-picked reactivation rate are former

00:21:36.779 --> 00:21:38.540
patients coming back when they have a new

00:21:38.601 --> 00:21:40.701
need i call it friends family and former

00:21:40.760 --> 00:21:42.682
patient percentage what percentage of your

00:21:42.721 --> 00:21:45.462
new patients fall into that bucket that is

00:21:45.522 --> 00:21:47.182
really critical to me because it means

00:21:47.202 --> 00:21:48.844
you're spending zero dollars

00:21:49.364 --> 00:21:51.424
under what you should be doing to get

00:21:51.464 --> 00:21:52.026
your marketing,

00:21:52.066 --> 00:21:53.807
which is providing great care.

00:21:54.207 --> 00:21:55.867
That's continuity and it's its most

00:21:55.928 --> 00:21:56.749
measurable form.

00:21:57.729 --> 00:21:58.950
None of these are as clean or as

00:21:58.970 --> 00:22:00.270
visible as a star rating.

00:22:00.490 --> 00:22:00.810
You know,

00:22:01.511 --> 00:22:03.212
in order to get to the answer,

00:22:03.272 --> 00:22:05.034
it's not a simple answer like a star

00:22:05.074 --> 00:22:05.354
rating.

00:22:05.374 --> 00:22:06.974
That's exactly why they matter more.

00:22:07.035 --> 00:22:09.156
The metrics that are easy to show off

00:22:09.196 --> 00:22:10.477
are usually the ones that have already

00:22:10.518 --> 00:22:11.137
been gained.

00:22:11.178 --> 00:22:12.778
The ones that are harder to show off

00:22:12.818 --> 00:22:14.259
are the ones that's actually happening.

00:22:14.894 --> 00:22:15.976
Yeah.

00:22:15.996 --> 00:22:17.396
Anything you'd want to leave the audience

00:22:17.436 --> 00:22:19.157
with as we wrap up?

00:22:19.198 --> 00:22:20.179
Your parting thoughts?

00:22:20.618 --> 00:22:21.900
No, just, you know,

00:22:22.119 --> 00:22:23.901
not telling you not to do Google ratings.

00:22:24.000 --> 00:22:26.403
Just don't overvalue them and don't spend

00:22:26.462 --> 00:22:28.163
all you're trying to get more of them.

00:22:28.663 --> 00:22:30.746
Reroute that same effort into something

00:22:30.786 --> 00:22:32.507
that brings meaningful change into the

00:22:32.547 --> 00:22:33.768
operations of your practice.

00:22:33.788 --> 00:22:34.488
I mean,

00:22:34.587 --> 00:22:36.769
as a guy who's spent some years in

00:22:36.809 --> 00:22:37.950
marketing and communications,

00:22:37.970 --> 00:22:39.391
the best marketing is a really,

00:22:39.451 --> 00:22:41.613
really great product and or service.

00:22:42.212 --> 00:22:43.253
If you're trying to become a better

00:22:43.354 --> 00:22:44.315
operator in healthcare,

00:22:45.111 --> 00:22:45.833
you're in the right place.

00:22:45.893 --> 00:22:46.775
If this episode hit,

00:22:46.815 --> 00:22:48.419
Larry goes deeper inside his writing.

00:22:48.819 --> 00:22:50.304
Look for the operator on Substack.

00:22:50.324 --> 00:22:51.948
We'll also drop a link below.

00:22:51.968 --> 00:22:53.191
That's where the full breakdown lives.

00:22:53.211 --> 00:22:53.873
We'll see you next time.